But even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes. ...
The case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward. ...
topThe case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward.
top... California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes.
top"We are aware of no authority suggesting that the Take Care Clause empowers federal executive interference with state election procedures based solely on the federal executive's own initiative, and not in relation to another branch's constitutionally authorized act," the court's...
topThe case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward
topBut even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes
top"We are aware of no authority suggesting that the Take Care Clause empowers federal executive interference with state election procedures based solely on the federal executive's own initiative, and not in relation to another branch's constitutionally authorized...
top... federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes.
topBut even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion...
topBut even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes.
topThe case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward.
topBut even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's...
topBut even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes
topAt the heart of the issue is whether Trump was acting within the "outer perimeters" of his presidential duties in a campaign that allegedly included urging state officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral results and falsifying...
top... argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties.
topIn an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties
topBush, dismantled Meadows'assertions that his involvement in Trump's plots were part of a legitimate White House effort to supervise state election administration.
topThe case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward.. . At the heart of the issue is whether Trump was acting within the "outer perimeters" of his presidential duties in a campaign that allegedly included urging state officials...
topThe case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward.
topIn an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties
top... whether Trump was acting within the "outer perimeters" of his presidential duties in a campaign that allegedly included urging state officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral results and falsifying presidential electors to rival those from the states that Joe Biden won
topIn an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties
top... Trump's attempts to reverse his loss were in the realm of official presidential conduct, they'll be rebuffing the assessments of a broad swath of lower court judges - appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents alike - who have concluded otherwise.
topBut if the justices decide that Trump's attempts to reverse his loss were in the realm of official presidential conduct, they'll be rebuffing the assessments of a broad swath of lower court judges - appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents alike - who have concluded otherwise
topBut if the justices decide that Trump's attempts to reverse his loss were in the realm of official presidential conduct, they'll be rebuffing the assessments of a broad swath of lower court judges - appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents alike - who have concluded otherwise
topBut if the justices decide that Trump's attempts to reverse his loss were in the realm of official presidential conduct, they'll be rebuffing the assessments of a broad swath of lower court judges - appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents alike - who have...
top"We are aware of no authority suggesting that the Take Care Clause empowers federal executive interference with state election procedures based solely on the federal executive's own initiative, and not in relation to another branch's constitutionally authorized act," the court's opinion, authored by Circuit Chief Judge William Pryor,...
top... decide that Trump's attempts to reverse his loss were in the realm of official presidential conduct, they'll be rebuffing the assessments of a broad swath of lower court judges - appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents alike - who have concluded otherwise.
top. In the latter circumstance, a federal judge ruled that Trump's alleged conduct - including the fiery January 6 speech he gave before the Capitol attack - "do not relate to his duties of faithfully executing the laws, conducting foreign...
top. But even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion...
topIn the latter circumstance, a federal judge ruled that Trump's alleged conduct - including the fiery January 6 speech he gave before the Capitol attack - "do not relate to his duties of faithfully executing the laws, conducting foreign affairs, commanding the armed forces, or managing the Executive Branch."
topThe 11th Circuit cited Mehta's ruling in the private January 6 litigation to conclude, "Campaigning for a specific candidate is not official conduct because the office of the President is disinterested in who holds it.". . Criminalizing presidential conduct.. . Trump's briefs at the Supreme Court argue that, without absolute immunity for former presidents, several presidents...
topIn an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part...
topThe 11th Circuit cited Mehta's ruling in the private January 6 litigation to conclude, "Campaigning for a specific candidate is not official conduct because the office of the President is disinterested in who holds it."
top... the heart of the issue is whether Trump was acting within the "outer perimeters" of his presidential duties in a campaign that allegedly included urging state officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral results and falsifying presidential electors to rival those from the states that Joe Biden won
top... "Campaigning for a specific candidate is not official conduct because the office of the President is disinterested in who holds it.". . Criminalizing presidential conduct.. . Trump's briefs at the Supreme Court argue that, without absolute immunity for former presidents, several presidents who preceded him could have been prosecuted for official acts that are opposed by their political rivals
topTrump's briefs at the Supreme Court argue that, without absolute immunity for former presidents, several presidents who preceded him could have been prosecuted for official acts that are opposed by their political rivals.
topDistinguishing electioneering from the duties of a president. . A key claim Trump has made in the criminal immunity dispute before the Supreme Court is that he is being prosecuted for alleged acts that were part of his duties as president
top"They entirely concern his efforts to remain in office for a second term," US District Judge Amit Mehta, an Obama appointee, wrote in 2022, allowing several civil lawsuits against Trump to advance towards trial
top... for a second term," US District Judge Amit Mehta, an Obama appointee, wrote in 2022, allowing several civil lawsuits against Trump to advance towards trial. "These are unofficial acts, so the separation-of-powers concerns that justify the President's broad immunity are not present here."
topAt the heart of the issue is whether Trump was acting within the "outer perimeters" of his presidential duties in a campaign that allegedly included urging state officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral...
top"They entirely concern his efforts to remain in office for a second term," US District Judge Amit Mehta, an Obama appointee, wrote in 2022, allowing several civil lawsuits against Trump to advance towards trial
top... officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral results and falsifying presidential electors to rival those from the states that Joe Biden won.
top... campaign that allegedly included urging state officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral results and falsifying presidential electors to rival those from the states that Joe Biden won.
top... which also girds Fulton County's charges against Meadows, and noted that "the attorneys involved were employed by either Trump personally or by the Trump campaign - no attorneys from the Office of White House Counsel or the Department of Justice were present.".
top. The 11th Circuit focused particularly on Trump's January 2021 call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, which also girds Fulton County's charges against Meadows, and noted that "the attorneys involved were employed by either Trump personally or by the Trump campaign - no attorneys from the Office...
topThe appeals court left the door open for Trump to make narrower, more fact-based arguments for immunity, but it rejected his sweeping logic for why his campaign-aimed activity should be shielded.
top... entitles him to an absolute immunity from the civil suits, he claimed, regardless of whether he was also acting in the interests of his reelection. The appeals court left the door open for Trump to make narrower, more fact-based arguments for immunity, but it rejected his sweeping logic for why his campaign-aimed activity should be shielded
top. Distinguishing electioneering from the duties of a president. . A key claim Trump has made in the criminal immunity dispute before the Supreme Court is that he is being prosecuted for alleged acts that were part of his duties as president
top. In an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties
topJudges from around the country say Trump can be held accountable for January 6. What will the Supreme Court say.. . Whether the legal system can hold Donald Trump accountable for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election has been...
topWhat will the Supreme Court say.. . Whether the legal system can hold Donald Trump accountable for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election has been an evolving conversation among courts across the country.
top. Whether the legal system can hold Donald Trump accountable for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election has been an evolving conversation among courts across the country.
topJudges from around the country say Trump can be held accountable for January 6. What will the Supreme Court say.. . Whether the legal system can hold Donald Trump accountable for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election has been an evolving conversation among courts across the country
topThe 11th Circuit cited Mehta's ruling in the private January 6 litigation to conclude, "Campaigning for a specific candidate is not official conduct because the office of the President is disinterested in who holds it.". . Criminalizing presidential conduct.. . Trump's briefs at the Supreme Court argue that, without absolute immunity for former presidents, several presidents who preceded him...
topWhether the legal system can hold Donald Trump accountable for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election has been an evolving conversation among courts across the country.
topThe 11th Circuit cited Mehta's ruling in the private January 6 litigation to conclude, "Campaigning for a specific candidate is not official conduct because the office of the President is disinterested in who...
top. In an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part...
topThe 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, led by a very conservative appointee of President George W. Bush, dismantled Meadows'assertions that his involvement in Trump's plots were part of a legitimate White House effort to supervise state election administration
topThe 11th Circuit focused particularly on Trump's January 2021 call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, which also girds Fulton County's charges against Meadows, and noted that "the attorneys involved were employed by either Trump personally or by the Trump campaign - no attorneys from the Office of White House Counsel or the Department of Justice were present."
topThe justices will be hearing arguments on Trump's claims that the protections of the presidency immunize his alleged election subversion conduct. The case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward
topIn the Georgia election subversion prosecution brought by the Fulton County district attorney, Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tried to move the charges against him to federal courts, for the purposes of arguing that he was entitled to federal immunity in the case
topIn the Georgia election subversion prosecution brought by the Fulton County district attorney, Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tried to move the charges against him to federal courts, for the purposes of arguing that he was entitled to federal immunity in the case
topIn the Georgia election subversion prosecution brought by the Fulton County district attorney, Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tried to move the charges against him to federal courts, for the purposes of arguing that he was entitled to federal immunity in the case
top... arguments on Trump's claims that the protections of the presidency immunize his alleged election subversion conduct. The case will decide whether the federal criminal case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump for his 2020 election schemes can go forward.
top... in Trump's plots were part of a legitimate White House effort to supervise state election administration.. . "We are aware of no authority suggesting that the Take Care Clause empowers federal executive interference with state election procedures based solely on the federal executive's own initiative, and not in relation to another branch's constitutionally authorized act," the court's...
topBush, dismantled Meadows'assertions that his involvement in Trump's plots were part of a legitimate White House effort to supervise state election administration.. . "We are aware of no authority suggesting that the Take Care Clause empowers federal executive interference with state election procedures based...
top... Meadows'assertions that his involvement in Trump's plots were part of a legitimate White House effort to supervise state election administration.. . "We are aware of no authority suggesting that the Take Care Clause empowers federal executive interference with state election procedures based solely on the federal executive's own initiative, and not in relation to another branch's constitutionally authorized...
topBush, dismantled Meadows'assertions that his involvement in Trump's plots were part of a legitimate White House effort to supervise state election administration.
topThat claim was rejected both by a US district judge and by a federal appeals court.. . The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, led by a very conservative appointee of President George W.
topThat claim was rejected both by a US district judge and by a federal appeals court.. . The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, led by a very conservative appointee of President George W
topThey've approached it in disputes over the congressional probe into the Trump actions preceding and during the attack on Capitol, and in the context of civil January 6, 2021-related litigation against Trump and his allies.
topIn the latter circumstance, a federal judge ruled that Trump's alleged conduct - including the fiery January 6 speech he gave before the Capitol attack - "do not relate to his duties of faithfully executing the laws, conducting foreign affairs, commanding the armed forces, or managing the Executive Branch."
topTrump's briefs at the Supreme Court argue that, without absolute immunity for former presidents, several presidents who preceded him could have been prosecuted for official acts that are opposed by their political rivals.
topThey've approached it in disputes over the congressional probe into the Trump actions preceding and during the attack on Capitol, and in the context of civil January 6, 2021-related litigation against Trump and his allies.
topTrump's briefs at the Supreme Court argue that, without absolute immunity for former presidents, several presidents who preceded him could have been prosecuted for official acts that are opposed by their political rivals.. . But even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit...
top... circumstance, a federal judge ruled that Trump's alleged conduct - including the fiery January 6 speech he gave before the Capitol attack - "do not relate to his duties of faithfully executing the laws, conducting foreign affairs, commanding the armed forces, or managing the Executive Branch."
topOn Thursday, the Supreme Court will enter the chat.. . The high court is by no means bound by how other federal courts have interpreted the legitimacy of Trump's post-election conduct.. . But if the justices decide that Trump's attempts to reverse his loss were in the realm of official presidential conduct, they'll...
topIn the Georgia election subversion prosecution brought by the Fulton County district attorney, Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tried to move the charges against him to federal courts, for the purposes of arguing that he was entitled to federal immunity in the case..
topIn the Georgia election subversion prosecution brought by the Fulton County district attorney, Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tried to move the charges against him to federal courts, for the purposes of arguing that he was entitled to federal immunity in the case.
top... California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes.. . US District Judge David O. Carter, an appointee of Bill Clinton, ruled in March 2022 that Eastman and Trump "more likely than not" committed obstruction of an official proceeding and engaged...
topBut even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes.
top... rejected by judges who have addressed his and his aides'post-election conduct in other circumstances.. . In the Georgia election subversion prosecution brought by the Fulton County district attorney, Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tried to move the charges against him to federal courts, for the purposes of arguing that he was entitled to federal immunity in the case
topBut even before Smith filed his indictment, a federal judge in California described Trump's conduct as likely criminal in a case concerning the House January 6 Committee's pursuit of emails by John Eastman, an architect of Trump's election subversion schemes.. . US District Judge David O
top... argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties. That entitles him to an absolute immunity from the civil suits, he claimed, regardless of whether he was also acting in the interests of his reelection
topWhether the legal system can hold Donald Trump accountable for his attempts to overturn the 2020 election has been an evolving conversation among courts across the country. On Thursday, the Supreme Court will enter the chat.
topIn the Georgia election subversion prosecution brought by the Fulton County district attorney, Trump White House chief of staff Mark Meadows tried to move the charges against him to federal courts, for the purposes of arguing that he was entitled to federal immunity in the case.
topAt the heart of the issue is whether Trump was acting within the "outer perimeters" of his presidential duties in a campaign that allegedly included urging state officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral results and falsifying presidential electors to rival those from the states that Joe Biden won
topIn an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties.
topAt the heart of the issue is whether Trump was acting within the "outer perimeters" of his presidential duties in a campaign that allegedly included urging state officials to reverse his election loss, pressuring his vice president to disrupt Congress'certification of the electoral results and falsifying presidential electors...
top"When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act," Obama-appointed Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan said in a US DC Circuit Court of Appeals opinion last year
top"When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act," Obama-appointed Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan said in a US DC Circuit Court of Appeals opinion last year.
top"When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act," Obama-appointed Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan said in a US DC Circuit Court of Appeals opinion last year
top"These are unofficial acts, so the separation-of-powers concerns that justify the President's broad immunity are not present here.". . In an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part...
top... narrower, more fact-based arguments for immunity, but it rejected his sweeping logic for why his campaign-aimed activity should be shielded.. . "When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act," Obama-appointed Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan said in a US DC Circuit Court of Appeals opinion last year
top... so the separation-of-powers concerns that justify the President's broad immunity are not present here.". . In an appeal of Mehta's ruling, Trump argued that in his pre-riot remarks near the White House, he was speaking on a matter of public concern - his supposed worries about fraud in the election - and thus the conduct was part of his official presidential duties
topCarter, an appointee of Bill Clinton, ruled in March 2022 that Eastman and Trump "more likely than not" committed obstruction of an official proceeding and engaged conspiracy to defraud the United States - both crimes Smith eventually charged against the former president.. . "Because President Trump likely knew that the plan to disrupt the electoral count was wrongful, his mindset exceeds the threshold...
topThe appeals court left the door open for Trump to make narrower, more fact-based arguments for immunity, but it rejected his sweeping logic for why his campaign-aimed activity should be shielded.. . "When a first-term President opts to seek a second term, his campaign to win re-election is not an official presidential act," Obama-appointed Circuit Judge Sri Srinivasan said in a US DC Circuit Court...